Switzerland
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
231
Grants
126
Denials
105
Grant rate: 54.5%Denial rate: 45.5%
Immigration judge
Peter A Kim
Community discussion · 0Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
- Status
- active
- Data source
- EOIR Case Data
Grant rate
48.4%
310 / 641
Total decisions
641
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
48.4%
Grants: 310
Denial rate
51.6%
Denials: 331
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
Judge profile
This profile is summarized from public sources for background context only. It is not an ImmJudge evaluation.
Peter A. Kim was appointed as an Immigration Judge to begin hearing cases in February 2023. Judge Kim earned a Juris Doctor in 2006 from the University of West Los Angeles. From 2007 to 2022, he was in private practice at the Law Offices of Peter A. Kim in Los Angeles where he represented noncitizens before the immigration court and U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, Department of Homeland Security. Judge Kim is a member of the State Bar of California.
This summary is based on public material and may not reflect the latest assignment information.
Source: TRAC Judge Report · View original report
Outcome distribution
Grants310 / 641
Denials331 / 641
Other relief0 / 641
Community perspective
Community discussion
Read public experiences and process discussions related to Peter A Kim.
0 topics
You can start with these public topics
- Share a public process or preparation experience
- Discuss how to interpret public data
- Ask a question without personal case details
Case details
0 rowsThis table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Case Ratio
-
Distribution
Showing 0 of 0
View by applicant nationality
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Switzerland Sufficient sample | 231 | 126 | 105 | 54.5% | 45.5% | View details | |
Niue Sufficient sample | 90 | 20 | 70 | 22.2% | 77.8% | View details | |
Russia Sufficient sample | 66 | 55 | 11 | 83.3% | 16.7% | View details | |
Armenia Sufficient sample | 62 | 55 | 7 | 88.7% | 11.3% | View details | |
Guatemala Sufficient sample | 38 | 6 | 32 | 15.8% | 84.2% | View details | |
Honduras Moderate sample | 22 | 2 | 20 | 9.1% | 90.9% | View details | |
Colombia Moderate sample | 21 | 3 | 18 | 14.3% | 85.7% | View details | |
Spain Moderate sample | 20 | 1 | 19 | 5.0% | 95.0% | View details | |
Mexico Moderate sample | 18 | 2 | 16 | 11.1% | 88.9% | View details | |
Kazakhstan Moderate sample | 11 | 11 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Peru Moderate sample | 10 | 4 | 6 | 40.0% | 60.0% | View details | |
Venezuela Moderate sample | 10 | 0 | 10 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Egypt Small sample | 7 | 5 | 2 | 71.4% | 28.6% | View details | |
Ecuador Small sample | 6 | 0 | 6 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
India Small sample | 6 | 4 | 2 | 66.7% | 33.3% | View details | |
Iceland Small sample | 4 | 4 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Iran Small sample | 4 | 1 | 3 | 25.0% | 75.0% | View details | |
China Small sample | 3 | 2 | 1 | 66.7% | 33.3% | View details | |
Indonesia Small sample | 3 | 3 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Nicaragua Small sample | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details |
View details
Niue
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
90
Grants
20
Denials
70
Grant rate: 22.2%Denial rate: 77.8%
Russia
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
66
Grants
55
Denials
11
Grant rate: 83.3%Denial rate: 16.7%
Armenia
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
62
Grants
55
Denials
7
Grant rate: 88.7%Denial rate: 11.3%
Guatemala
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
38
Grants
6
Denials
32
Grant rate: 15.8%Denial rate: 84.2%
Honduras
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
22
Grants
2
Denials
20
Grant rate: 9.1%Denial rate: 90.9%
Colombia
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
21
Grants
3
Denials
18
Grant rate: 14.3%Denial rate: 85.7%
Spain
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
20
Grants
1
Denials
19
Grant rate: 5.0%Denial rate: 95.0%
Mexico
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
18
Grants
2
Denials
16
Grant rate: 11.1%Denial rate: 88.9%
Kazakhstan
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
11
Grants
11
Denials
0
Grant rate: 100.0%Denial rate: 0.0%
Peru
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
10
Grants
4
Denials
6
Grant rate: 40.0%Denial rate: 60.0%
Venezuela
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
10
Grants
0
Denials
10
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
Egypt
Small sampleTotal decisions
7
Grants
5
Denials
2
Grant rate: 71.4%Denial rate: 28.6%
Ecuador
Small sampleTotal decisions
6
Grants
0
Denials
6
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
India
Small sampleTotal decisions
6
Grants
4
Denials
2
Grant rate: 66.7%Denial rate: 33.3%
Iceland
Small sampleTotal decisions
4
Grants
4
Denials
0
Grant rate: 100.0%Denial rate: 0.0%
Iran
Small sampleTotal decisions
4
Grants
1
Denials
3
Grant rate: 25.0%Denial rate: 75.0%
China
Small sampleTotal decisions
3
Grants
2
Denials
1
Grant rate: 66.7%Denial rate: 33.3%
Indonesia
Small sampleTotal decisions
3
Grants
3
Denials
0
Grant rate: 100.0%Denial rate: 0.0%
Nicaragua
Small sampleTotal decisions
2
Grants
0
Denials
2
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Other judges at the same immigration court
Nathan N Aina
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 33.4%
- Denial Rate
- 66.7%
Andrea Hong
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 34.8%
- Denial Rate
- 65.2%
Lily C Hsu
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 20.5%
- Denial Rate
- 79.5%
James M Left
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 20.5%
- Denial Rate
- 79.5%
Jake Nare
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 48.4%
- Denial Rate
- 51.6%
Kevin W Riley
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 10.9%
- Denial Rate
- 89.1%
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.