Mexico
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
164
Grants
1
Denials
163
Grant rate: 0.6%Denial rate: 99.4%
Immigration judge
Steven Marcus
Community discussion · 0Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
- Status
- active
- Data source
- EOIR Case Data
Grant rate
19.8%
166 / 838
Total decisions
838
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
19.8%
Grants: 166
Denial rate
80.2%
Denials: 672
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
Judge profile
This profile is summarized from public sources for background context only. It is not an ImmJudge evaluation.
Attorney General William P. Barr appointed Steven Marcus as an immigration judge in June 2020. Judge Marcus earned a Bachelor of Science in 1998 from University of California, Los Angeles and a Juris Doctor in 2004 from Glendale University College of Law. From 2006 to 2020, he served as an assistant chief counsel, Office of Chief Counsel, Office of the Principal Legal Advisor, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Department of Homeland Security, in Los Angeles. From 2005 to 2006, he was in private practice, in Los Angeles. Judge Marcus is amember of the State Bar of California.
This summary is based on public material and may not reflect the latest assignment information.
Source: TRAC Judge Report · View original report
Outcome distribution
Grants166 / 838
Denials672 / 838
Other relief0 / 838
Community perspective
Community discussion
Read public experiences and process discussions related to Steven Marcus.
0 topics
You can start with these public topics
- Share a public process or preparation experience
- Discuss how to interpret public data
- Ask a question without personal case details
Case details
0 rowsThis table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Case Ratio
-
Distribution
Showing 0 of 0
View by applicant nationality
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mexico Sufficient sample | 164 | 1 | 163 | 0.6% | 99.4% | View details | |
Russia Sufficient sample | 121 | 74 | 47 | 61.2% | 38.8% | View details | |
Guatemala Sufficient sample | 90 | 0 | 90 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Peru Sufficient sample | 83 | 5 | 78 | 6.0% | 94.0% | View details | |
Armenia Sufficient sample | 69 | 25 | 44 | 36.2% | 63.8% | View details | |
Niue Sufficient sample | 67 | 14 | 53 | 20.9% | 79.1% | View details | |
Spain Sufficient sample | 59 | 0 | 59 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Honduras Sufficient sample | 40 | 4 | 36 | 10.0% | 90.0% | View details | |
Colombia Sufficient sample | 33 | 1 | 32 | 3.0% | 97.0% | View details | |
India Moderate sample | 25 | 13 | 12 | 52.0% | 48.0% | View details | |
Iran Small sample | 8 | 3 | 5 | 37.5% | 62.5% | View details | |
Switzerland Small sample | 8 | 4 | 4 | 50.0% | 50.0% | View details | |
Venezuela Small sample | 7 | 0 | 7 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Ecuador Small sample | 6 | 0 | 6 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Cameroon Small sample | 4 | 4 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Uganda Small sample | 4 | 4 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Belize Small sample | 3 | 3 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Ethiopia Small sample | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Philippines Small sample | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Syria Small sample | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details |
View details
Russia
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
121
Grants
74
Denials
47
Grant rate: 61.2%Denial rate: 38.8%
Guatemala
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
90
Grants
0
Denials
90
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
Peru
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
83
Grants
5
Denials
78
Grant rate: 6.0%Denial rate: 94.0%
Armenia
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
69
Grants
25
Denials
44
Grant rate: 36.2%Denial rate: 63.8%
Niue
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
67
Grants
14
Denials
53
Grant rate: 20.9%Denial rate: 79.1%
Spain
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
59
Grants
0
Denials
59
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
Honduras
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
40
Grants
4
Denials
36
Grant rate: 10.0%Denial rate: 90.0%
Colombia
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
33
Grants
1
Denials
32
Grant rate: 3.0%Denial rate: 97.0%
India
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
25
Grants
13
Denials
12
Grant rate: 52.0%Denial rate: 48.0%
Iran
Small sampleTotal decisions
8
Grants
3
Denials
5
Grant rate: 37.5%Denial rate: 62.5%
Switzerland
Small sampleTotal decisions
8
Grants
4
Denials
4
Grant rate: 50.0%Denial rate: 50.0%
Venezuela
Small sampleTotal decisions
7
Grants
0
Denials
7
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
Ecuador
Small sampleTotal decisions
6
Grants
0
Denials
6
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
Cameroon
Small sampleTotal decisions
4
Grants
4
Denials
0
Grant rate: 100.0%Denial rate: 0.0%
Uganda
Small sampleTotal decisions
4
Grants
4
Denials
0
Grant rate: 100.0%Denial rate: 0.0%
Belize
Small sampleTotal decisions
3
Grants
3
Denials
0
Grant rate: 100.0%Denial rate: 0.0%
Ethiopia
Small sampleTotal decisions
3
Grants
0
Denials
3
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
Philippines
Small sampleTotal decisions
3
Grants
0
Denials
3
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
Syria
Small sampleTotal decisions
3
Grants
0
Denials
3
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Other judges at the same immigration court
Jonathan Masaji. Brent
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 22.9%
- Denial Rate
- 77.0%
Brian Burke
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 35.6%
- Denial Rate
- 64.4%
Arlene E Dorfman
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 34.6%
- Denial Rate
- 65.4%
Carlos E Maury
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 46.9%
- Denial Rate
- 53.1%
Paul N Medved
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 19.9%
- Denial Rate
- 80.2%
Sandra J Santos-Garcia
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 34.4%
- Denial Rate
- 65.6%
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.