Mexico
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
240
Grants
13
Denials
227
Immigration judge
Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
Grant rate
34.4%
433 / 1259
Total decisions
1259
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
34.4%
Grants: 433
Denial rate
65.6%
Denials: 826
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
This profile is summarized from public sources for background context only. It is not an ImmJudge evaluation.
Attorney General Loretta E. Lynch appointed Sandra J. Santos-Garcia to begin hearing cases in June 2016. Judge Santos-Garcia earned a Bachelor of Arts degree in 1998 and a Juris Doctor in 2001, both from the University of California, Berkeley. From 2010 through 2016, Judge Santos-Garcia served as a senior attorney for the Office of the Chief Counsel (OCC), Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), Department of Homeland Security (DHS). From 2001 through 2010, Judge Santos-Garcia served as assistant chief counsel for OCC, ICE, DHS. Judge Santos-Garcia is a member of the State Bars of Arizona and California.
This summary is based on public material and may not reflect the latest assignment information.
Source: TRAC Judge Report · View original report
Community perspective
Read public experiences and process discussions related to Sandra J Santos-Garcia.
You can start with these public topics
This table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Showing 0 of 0
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mexico Sufficient sample | 240 | 13 | 227 | 5.4% | 94.6% | View details | |
Armenia Sufficient sample | 164 | 123 | 41 | 75.0% | 25.0% | View details | |
Spain Sufficient sample | 152 | 4 | 148 | 2.6% | 97.4% | View details | |
Guatemala Sufficient sample | 119 | 5 | 114 | 4.2% | 95.8% | View details | |
Russia Sufficient sample | 103 | 84 | 19 | 81.6% | 18.4% | View details | |
Honduras Sufficient sample | 80 | 3 | 77 | 3.8% | 96.3% | View details | |
Niue Sufficient sample | 49 | 20 | 29 | 40.8% | 59.2% | View details | |
Cameroon Sufficient sample | 42 | 30 | 12 | 71.4% | 28.6% | View details | |
Peru Sufficient sample | 42 | 1 | 41 | 2.4% | 97.6% | View details | |
India Sufficient sample | 34 | 18 | 16 | 52.9% | 47.1% | View details | |
Eritrea Moderate sample | 24 | 21 | 3 | 87.5% | 12.5% | View details | |
Colombia Moderate sample | 23 | 0 | 23 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Switzerland Moderate sample | 22 | 8 | 14 | 36.4% | 63.6% | View details | |
Uganda Moderate sample | 18 | 18 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Belize Moderate sample | 14 | 13 | 1 | 92.9% | 7.1% | View details | |
Haiti Moderate sample | 14 | 0 | 14 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Iran Moderate sample | 14 | 11 | 3 | 78.6% | 21.4% | View details | |
Cuba Moderate sample | 12 | 11 | 1 | 91.7% | 8.3% | View details | |
Syria Moderate sample | 12 | 10 | 2 | 83.3% | 16.7% | View details | |
Egypt Small sample | 9 | 9 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details |
Total decisions
240
Grants
13
Denials
227
Total decisions
164
Grants
123
Denials
41
Total decisions
152
Grants
4
Denials
148
Total decisions
119
Grants
5
Denials
114
Total decisions
103
Grants
84
Denials
19
Total decisions
80
Grants
3
Denials
77
Total decisions
49
Grants
20
Denials
29
Total decisions
42
Grants
30
Denials
12
Total decisions
42
Grants
1
Denials
41
Total decisions
34
Grants
18
Denials
16
Total decisions
24
Grants
21
Denials
3
Total decisions
23
Grants
0
Denials
23
Total decisions
22
Grants
8
Denials
14
Total decisions
18
Grants
18
Denials
0
Total decisions
14
Grants
13
Denials
1
Total decisions
14
Grants
0
Denials
14
Total decisions
14
Grants
11
Denials
3
Total decisions
12
Grants
11
Denials
1
Total decisions
12
Grants
10
Denials
2
Total decisions
9
Grants
9
Denials
0
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.