Mexico
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
176
Grants
26
Denials
150
Grant rate: 14.8%Denial rate: 85.2%
Immigration judge
Paul N Medved
Community discussion · 0Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
- Status
- active
- Data source
- EOIR Case Data
Grant rate
19.9%
234 / 1179
Total decisions
1179
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
19.9%
Grants: 234
Denial rate
80.2%
Denials: 945
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
Judge profile
This profile is summarized from public sources for background context only. It is not an ImmJudge evaluation.
Paul N. Medved was appointed as an Immigration Judge to begin hearing cases in October 2021. Judge Medved earned a Bachelor of Arts in 1987 from the University of Minnesota and a Juris Doctor in 1992 from Hofstra University School of Law. From 2000 to 2021, he was Managing Attorney with the Law Offices of Paul N. Medved, in Studio City, California. From 1997 to 2000, he was an Associate Attorney with Korenberg, Abramowitz & Feldun, in Encino, California. Judge Medved is a member of the District of Columbia Bar and State Bar of California.
This summary is based on public material and may not reflect the latest assignment information.
Source: TRAC Judge Report · View original report
Outcome distribution
Grants234 / 1179
Denials945 / 1179
Other relief0 / 1179
Community perspective
Community discussion
Read public experiences and process discussions related to Paul N Medved.
0 topics
You can start with these public topics
- Share a public process or preparation experience
- Discuss how to interpret public data
- Ask a question without personal case details
Case details
0 rowsThis table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Case Ratio
-
Distribution
Showing 0 of 0
View by applicant nationality
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mexico Sufficient sample | 176 | 26 | 150 | 14.8% | 85.2% | View details | |
Armenia Sufficient sample | 155 | 62 | 93 | 40.0% | 60.0% | View details | |
Guatemala Sufficient sample | 154 | 5 | 149 | 3.2% | 96.8% | View details | |
Spain Sufficient sample | 145 | 3 | 142 | 2.1% | 97.9% | View details | |
Russia Sufficient sample | 137 | 68 | 69 | 49.6% | 50.4% | View details | |
Niue Sufficient sample | 83 | 20 | 63 | 24.1% | 75.9% | View details | |
Honduras Sufficient sample | 82 | 7 | 75 | 8.5% | 91.5% | View details | |
India Sufficient sample | 67 | 7 | 60 | 10.4% | 89.6% | View details | |
Peru Sufficient sample | 39 | 2 | 37 | 5.1% | 94.9% | View details | |
Colombia Sufficient sample | 31 | 0 | 31 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Venezuela Moderate sample | 21 | 4 | 17 | 19.0% | 81.0% | View details | |
Iran Moderate sample | 11 | 10 | 1 | 90.9% | 9.1% | View details | |
Afghanistan Small sample | 9 | 0 | 9 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Bulgaria Small sample | 7 | 0 | 7 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Egypt Small sample | 7 | 0 | 7 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Switzerland Small sample | 6 | 4 | 2 | 66.7% | 33.3% | View details | |
Romania Small sample | 5 | 5 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Uganda Small sample | 5 | 4 | 1 | 80.0% | 20.0% | View details | |
Uzbekistan Small sample | 5 | 1 | 4 | 20.0% | 80.0% | View details | |
Georgia Small sample | 4 | 0 | 4 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details |
View details
Armenia
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
155
Grants
62
Denials
93
Grant rate: 40.0%Denial rate: 60.0%
Guatemala
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
154
Grants
5
Denials
149
Grant rate: 3.2%Denial rate: 96.8%
Spain
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
145
Grants
3
Denials
142
Grant rate: 2.1%Denial rate: 97.9%
Russia
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
137
Grants
68
Denials
69
Grant rate: 49.6%Denial rate: 50.4%
Niue
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
83
Grants
20
Denials
63
Grant rate: 24.1%Denial rate: 75.9%
Honduras
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
82
Grants
7
Denials
75
Grant rate: 8.5%Denial rate: 91.5%
India
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
67
Grants
7
Denials
60
Grant rate: 10.4%Denial rate: 89.6%
Peru
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
39
Grants
2
Denials
37
Grant rate: 5.1%Denial rate: 94.9%
Colombia
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
31
Grants
0
Denials
31
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
Venezuela
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
21
Grants
4
Denials
17
Grant rate: 19.0%Denial rate: 81.0%
Iran
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
11
Grants
10
Denials
1
Grant rate: 90.9%Denial rate: 9.1%
Afghanistan
Small sampleTotal decisions
9
Grants
0
Denials
9
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
Bulgaria
Small sampleTotal decisions
7
Grants
0
Denials
7
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
Egypt
Small sampleTotal decisions
7
Grants
0
Denials
7
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
Switzerland
Small sampleTotal decisions
6
Grants
4
Denials
2
Grant rate: 66.7%Denial rate: 33.3%
Romania
Small sampleTotal decisions
5
Grants
5
Denials
0
Grant rate: 100.0%Denial rate: 0.0%
Uganda
Small sampleTotal decisions
5
Grants
4
Denials
1
Grant rate: 80.0%Denial rate: 20.0%
Uzbekistan
Small sampleTotal decisions
5
Grants
1
Denials
4
Grant rate: 20.0%Denial rate: 80.0%
Georgia
Small sampleTotal decisions
4
Grants
0
Denials
4
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Other judges at the same immigration court
Jonathan Masaji. Brent
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 22.9%
- Denial Rate
- 77.0%
Brian Burke
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 35.6%
- Denial Rate
- 64.4%
Arlene E Dorfman
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 34.6%
- Denial Rate
- 65.4%
Steven Marcus
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 19.8%
- Denial Rate
- 80.2%
Carlos E Maury
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 46.9%
- Denial Rate
- 53.1%
Sandra J Santos-Garcia
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 34.4%
- Denial Rate
- 65.6%
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.