Honduras
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
109
Grants
21
Denials
88
Grant rate: 19.3%Denial rate: 80.7%
Immigration judge
Clay Nelson Martin
Community discussion · 0Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
- Status
- active
- Data source
- EOIR Case Data
Grant rate
31.6%
87 / 275
Total decisions
275
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
31.6%
Grants: 87
Denial rate
68.4%
Denials: 188
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
Judge profile
This profile is summarized from public sources for background context only. It is not an ImmJudge evaluation.
Attorney General Loretta E. Lynch appointed Clay N. Martin to begin hearing cases in June 2016. Judge Martin earned a Bachelor of Arts degree in 1984 from Hendrix College and a Juris Doctor in 1987 from the St. Mary’s University School of Law. From 2008 through May 2016, Judge Martin served as a senior attorney for the Office of the Chief Counsel (OCC), Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), Department of Homeland Security (DHS). From 2002 through 2007, Judge Martin served as an assistant chief counsel for OCC, ICE, DHS. From 1995 through 2002, Judge Martin served as chief deputy prosecuting attorney for the 18th West Judicial District Prosecuting Attorney’s Office, in Polk and Montgomery counties, Ark. From 1992 through 1995, Judge Martin served as an assistant district attorney for the Bexar County District Attorney’s Office, in San Antonio. From 1989 through 1991, Judge Martin served as an attorney for Riddle and Brown, in Dallas. From 1988 through 1989, Judge Martin served as an attorney for Soules and Wallace, in San Antonio. From 1987 through 1988, Judge Martin served as an attorney for Hill, Heard, Oneal, Gilstrap & Goetz, in Arlington, Texas. Judge Martin is a member of the Arkansas Bar and the State Bar of Texas.
This summary is based on public material and may not reflect the latest assignment information.
Source: TRAC Judge Report · View original report
Outcome distribution
Grants87 / 275
Denials188 / 275
Other relief0 / 275
Community perspective
Community discussion
Read public experiences and process discussions related to Clay Nelson Martin.
0 topics
You can start with these public topics
- Share a public process or preparation experience
- Discuss how to interpret public data
- Ask a question without personal case details
Case details
0 rowsThis table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Case Ratio
-
Distribution
Showing 0 of 0
View by applicant nationality
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Honduras Sufficient sample | 109 | 21 | 88 | 19.3% | 80.7% | View details | |
Spain Moderate sample | 28 | 2 | 26 | 7.1% | 92.9% | View details | |
Venezuela Moderate sample | 23 | 20 | 3 | 87.0% | 13.0% | View details | |
Guatemala Moderate sample | 21 | 2 | 19 | 9.5% | 90.5% | View details | |
Cuba Moderate sample | 13 | 3 | 10 | 23.1% | 76.9% | View details | |
Somalia Moderate sample | 11 | 2 | 9 | 18.2% | 81.8% | View details | |
Niue Small sample | 9 | 6 | 3 | 66.7% | 33.3% | View details | |
Haiti Small sample | 8 | 0 | 8 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Angola Small sample | 7 | 7 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Syria Small sample | 6 | 5 | 1 | 83.3% | 16.7% | View details | |
Mexico Small sample | 5 | 1 | 4 | 20.0% | 80.0% | View details | |
Cameroon Small sample | 4 | 3 | 1 | 75.0% | 25.0% | View details | |
Ecuador Small sample | 4 | 0 | 4 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Nepal Small sample | 4 | 4 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Guinea Small sample | 3 | 1 | 2 | 33.3% | 66.7% | View details | |
India Small sample | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Eritrea Small sample | 2 | 2 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Ethiopia Small sample | 2 | 1 | 1 | 50.0% | 50.0% | View details | |
Afghanistan Small sample | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Brazil Small sample | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details |
View details
Spain
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
28
Grants
2
Denials
26
Grant rate: 7.1%Denial rate: 92.9%
Venezuela
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
23
Grants
20
Denials
3
Grant rate: 87.0%Denial rate: 13.0%
Guatemala
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
21
Grants
2
Denials
19
Grant rate: 9.5%Denial rate: 90.5%
Cuba
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
13
Grants
3
Denials
10
Grant rate: 23.1%Denial rate: 76.9%
Somalia
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
11
Grants
2
Denials
9
Grant rate: 18.2%Denial rate: 81.8%
Niue
Small sampleTotal decisions
9
Grants
6
Denials
3
Grant rate: 66.7%Denial rate: 33.3%
Haiti
Small sampleTotal decisions
8
Grants
0
Denials
8
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
Angola
Small sampleTotal decisions
7
Grants
7
Denials
0
Grant rate: 100.0%Denial rate: 0.0%
Syria
Small sampleTotal decisions
6
Grants
5
Denials
1
Grant rate: 83.3%Denial rate: 16.7%
Mexico
Small sampleTotal decisions
5
Grants
1
Denials
4
Grant rate: 20.0%Denial rate: 80.0%
Cameroon
Small sampleTotal decisions
4
Grants
3
Denials
1
Grant rate: 75.0%Denial rate: 25.0%
Ecuador
Small sampleTotal decisions
4
Grants
0
Denials
4
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
Nepal
Small sampleTotal decisions
4
Grants
4
Denials
0
Grant rate: 100.0%Denial rate: 0.0%
Guinea
Small sampleTotal decisions
3
Grants
1
Denials
2
Grant rate: 33.3%Denial rate: 66.7%
India
Small sampleTotal decisions
3
Grants
0
Denials
3
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
Eritrea
Small sampleTotal decisions
2
Grants
2
Denials
0
Grant rate: 100.0%Denial rate: 0.0%
Ethiopia
Small sampleTotal decisions
2
Grants
1
Denials
1
Grant rate: 50.0%Denial rate: 50.0%
Afghanistan
Small sampleTotal decisions
1
Grants
0
Denials
1
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
Brazil
Small sampleTotal decisions
1
Grants
0
Denials
1
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Other judges at the same immigration court
Justin Adams
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 12.7%
- Denial Rate
- 87.3%
Arvid C. Boyes
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 23.7%
- Denial Rate
- 76.3%
Richard F. Brodsky
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 24.8%
- Denial Rate
- 75.2%
Margaret D Burkhart
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 65.2%
- Denial Rate
- 34.8%
Thomas G. Jr Crossan
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 20.1%
- Denial Rate
- 79.9%
Yvonne S. Gonzalez
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 38.6%
- Denial Rate
- 61.4%
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.