Ecuador
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
102
Grants
16
Denials
86
Immigration judge
Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
Grant rate
28.6%
203 / 711
Total decisions
711
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
28.6%
Grants: 203
Denial rate
71.5%
Denials: 508
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
This profile is summarized from public sources for background context only. It is not an ImmJudge evaluation.
Attorney General Loretta E. Lynch appointed Judge Rastegar to begin hearing cases in January 2016. Judge Rastegar received a Bachelor of Science in 1991 from George Mason University and a Juris Doctor in 1995 from New York Law School. From 2000 through 2015, Judge Rastegar served as assistant chief counsel in the Office of the Chief Counsel, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Department of Homeland Security, in New York, N.Y. From 1997 through 2000, Judge Rastegar served as an associate at Barst and Mukamal LLP, in New York, N.Y., and from 1996 through 1997, as an associate in the Law Offices of Ronald Salomon, in New York, N.Y. Judge Rastegar is a member of the Connecticut and New York Bars.
This summary is based on public material and may not reflect the latest assignment information.
Source: TRAC Judge Report · View original report
Community perspective
Read public experiences and process discussions related to Ramin Rastegar.
You can start with these public topics
This table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Showing 0 of 0
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ecuador Sufficient sample | 102 | 16 | 86 | 15.7% | 84.3% | View details | |
Spain Sufficient sample | 66 | 16 | 50 | 24.2% | 75.8% | View details | |
Honduras Sufficient sample | 65 | 10 | 55 | 15.4% | 84.6% | View details | |
Guatemala Sufficient sample | 51 | 2 | 49 | 3.9% | 96.1% | View details | |
Peru Sufficient sample | 50 | 4 | 46 | 8.0% | 92.0% | View details | |
Egypt Sufficient sample | 35 | 33 | 2 | 94.3% | 5.7% | View details | |
Brazil Sufficient sample | 34 | 0 | 34 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Colombia Sufficient sample | 34 | 4 | 30 | 11.8% | 88.2% | View details | |
Nicaragua Moderate sample | 28 | 22 | 6 | 78.6% | 21.4% | View details | |
Mexico Moderate sample | 26 | 0 | 26 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
India Moderate sample | 21 | 9 | 12 | 42.9% | 57.1% | View details | |
Switzerland Moderate sample | 21 | 10 | 11 | 47.6% | 52.4% | View details | |
Niue Moderate sample | 20 | 3 | 17 | 15.0% | 85.0% | View details | |
Venezuela Moderate sample | 18 | 6 | 12 | 33.3% | 66.7% | View details | |
Turkiye Moderate sample | 13 | 7 | 6 | 53.8% | 46.2% | View details | |
Haiti Moderate sample | 12 | 1 | 11 | 8.3% | 91.7% | View details | |
Russia Moderate sample | 12 | 8 | 4 | 66.7% | 33.3% | View details | |
Sierra Leone Small sample | 7 | 5 | 2 | 71.4% | 28.6% | View details | |
Dominican Republic Small sample | 6 | 0 | 6 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Pakistan Small sample | 6 | 5 | 1 | 83.3% | 16.7% | View details |
Total decisions
102
Grants
16
Denials
86
Total decisions
66
Grants
16
Denials
50
Total decisions
65
Grants
10
Denials
55
Total decisions
51
Grants
2
Denials
49
Total decisions
50
Grants
4
Denials
46
Total decisions
35
Grants
33
Denials
2
Total decisions
34
Grants
0
Denials
34
Total decisions
34
Grants
4
Denials
30
Total decisions
28
Grants
22
Denials
6
Total decisions
26
Grants
0
Denials
26
Total decisions
21
Grants
9
Denials
12
Total decisions
21
Grants
10
Denials
11
Total decisions
20
Grants
3
Denials
17
Total decisions
18
Grants
6
Denials
12
Total decisions
13
Grants
7
Denials
6
Total decisions
12
Grants
1
Denials
11
Total decisions
12
Grants
8
Denials
4
Total decisions
7
Grants
5
Denials
2
Total decisions
6
Grants
0
Denials
6
Total decisions
6
Grants
5
Denials
1
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.