Immigration judge

Daniel J Santander

Community discussion · 0

Public EOIR asylum decision statistics

Status
active
Data source
EOIR Case Data

Grant rate

39.2%

280 / 715

Total decisions

715

Merits decision sample in current public statistics

Grant rate

39.2%

Grants: 280

Denial rate

60.8%

Denials: 435

Other relief rate

0.0%

Other relief: 0

Judge profile

This profile is summarized from public sources for background context only. It is not an ImmJudge evaluation.

Attorney General Eric Holder appointed Judge Santander in October 2010. Judge Santander received a bachelor of science degree in 1990 and a juris doctorate in 1994, both from the University of Arizona. From 2008 to October 2010, he worked as an assistant chief counsel, Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Tucson, Ariz. During that time, Judge Santander served in the U.S. Army in Tallil, Iraq, as trial counsel and acting brigade judge advocate from 2008 to 2009. From 2007 to 2008, he worked as a judge pro tempore for the Pima County Consolidated Justice Courts, Tucson. During that time, Judge Santander was a union attorney for the Police Officers Research Association of California, Legal Defense Fund, Stockton, Calif., and in private practice in Tucson from 2006 to 2008. From 1999 to 2005, Judge Santander was an assistant U.S. attorney for the Department of Justice, U.S. Attorney's Office, District of Arizona, Criminal Division. In 2003, he joined the U.S. Army Reserve, where he continues to work as judge advocate. From 1996 to 1999, Judge Santander served as an assistant district counsel for the former Immigration and Naturalization Service, Tucson. From 1995 to 1996, he worked as a litigation associate for Linden, Chapa & Fields, Tucson. Judge Santander is a member of the State Bar of Arizona.

This summary is based on public material and may not reflect the latest assignment information.

Source: TRAC Judge Report · View original report

Outcome distribution

Grants280 / 715
Denials435 / 715
Other relief0 / 715

Community perspective

Community discussion

Read public experiences and process discussions related to Daniel J Santander.

0 topics

You can start with these public topics

  • Share a public process or preparation experience
  • Discuss how to interpret public data
  • Ask a question without personal case details

Case details

0 rows

This table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.

Case Ratio

-

Distribution

Showing 0 of 0

View by applicant nationality

Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.

Cuba

Sufficient sample
View details

Total decisions

121

Grants

44

Denials

77

Grant rate: 36.4%Denial rate: 63.6%

Venezuela

Sufficient sample
View details

Total decisions

107

Grants

60

Denials

47

Grant rate: 56.1%Denial rate: 43.9%

Honduras

Sufficient sample
View details

Total decisions

102

Grants

18

Denials

84

Grant rate: 17.6%Denial rate: 82.4%

Mexico

Sufficient sample
View details

Total decisions

69

Grants

4

Denials

65

Grant rate: 5.8%Denial rate: 94.2%

Spain

Sufficient sample
View details

Total decisions

61

Grants

14

Denials

47

Grant rate: 23.0%Denial rate: 77.0%

Nepal

Sufficient sample
View details

Total decisions

50

Grants

33

Denials

17

Grant rate: 66.0%Denial rate: 34.0%

Guatemala

Sufficient sample
View details

Total decisions

38

Grants

11

Denials

27

Grant rate: 28.9%Denial rate: 71.1%

Niue

Moderate sample
View details

Total decisions

22

Grants

7

Denials

15

Grant rate: 31.8%Denial rate: 68.2%

Colombia

Moderate sample
View details

Total decisions

15

Grants

7

Denials

8

Grant rate: 46.7%Denial rate: 53.3%

Afghanistan

Moderate sample
View details

Total decisions

13

Grants

10

Denials

3

Grant rate: 76.9%Denial rate: 23.1%

Bulgaria

Moderate sample
View details

Total decisions

12

Grants

9

Denials

3

Grant rate: 75.0%Denial rate: 25.0%

Peru

Small sample
View details

Total decisions

9

Grants

5

Denials

4

Grant rate: 55.6%Denial rate: 44.4%

Eritrea

Small sample
View details

Total decisions

8

Grants

6

Denials

2

Grant rate: 75.0%Denial rate: 25.0%

Ethiopia

Small sample
View details

Total decisions

8

Grants

8

Denials

0

Grant rate: 100.0%Denial rate: 0.0%

Somalia

Small sample
View details

Total decisions

8

Grants

1

Denials

7

Grant rate: 12.5%Denial rate: 87.5%

India

Small sample
View details

Total decisions

7

Grants

3

Denials

4

Grant rate: 42.9%Denial rate: 57.1%

Cameroon

Small sample
View details

Total decisions

6

Grants

6

Denials

0

Grant rate: 100.0%Denial rate: 0.0%

Pakistan

Small sample
View details

Total decisions

6

Grants

6

Denials

0

Grant rate: 100.0%Denial rate: 0.0%

Democratic Republic Of Congo

Small sample
View details

Total decisions

4

Grants

3

Denials

1

Grant rate: 75.0%Denial rate: 25.0%

Ecuador

Small sample
View details

Total decisions

4

Grants

1

Denials

3

Grant rate: 25.0%Denial rate: 75.0%

These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.

Other judges at the same immigration court

Justin Adams

Status: active

Asylum Grant Rate
12.7%
Denial Rate
87.3%
View details

Arvid C. Boyes

Status: active

Asylum Grant Rate
23.7%
Denial Rate
76.3%
View details

Richard F. Brodsky

Status: active

Asylum Grant Rate
24.8%
Denial Rate
75.2%
View details

Margaret D Burkhart

Status: active

Asylum Grant Rate
65.2%
Denial Rate
34.8%
View details

Thomas G. Jr Crossan

Status: active

Asylum Grant Rate
20.1%
Denial Rate
79.9%
View details

Yvonne S. Gonzalez

Status: active

Asylum Grant Rate
38.6%
Denial Rate
61.4%
View details
Disclaimer

This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.