Brazil
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
146
Grants
31
Denials
115
Immigration judge
Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
Grant rate
20.4%
82 / 402
Total decisions
402
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
20.4%
Grants: 82
Denial rate
79.6%
Denials: 320
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
This profile is summarized from public sources for background context only. It is not an ImmJudge evaluation.
Natalie Ellen Smith was appointed as an immigration judge to begin hearing cases in November 2023. Judge Smith earned a Bachelor of Arts in 2008 from New York University and a Juris Doctor in 2012 from Fordham University School of Law. From 2021 to 2023, she served as an assistant chief counsel with the Office of the Principal Legal Advisor, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Department of Homeland Security, in New York. From 2012 to 2021, she served as assistant corporation counsel and then as an assistant borough chief and deputy borough chief in the Family Court Division of the New York City Law Department. Judge Smith is a member of the New York State Bar and Ohio State Bar.
This summary is based on public material and may not reflect the latest assignment information.
Source: TRAC Judge Report · View original report
Community perspective
Read public experiences and process discussions related to Natalie Smith.
You can start with these public topics
This table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Showing 0 of 0
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Brazil Sufficient sample | 146 | 31 | 115 | 21.2% | 78.8% | View details | |
Guatemala Sufficient sample | 49 | 3 | 46 | 6.1% | 93.9% | View details | |
Ecuador Moderate sample | 26 | 4 | 22 | 15.4% | 84.6% | View details | |
Angola Moderate sample | 20 | 4 | 16 | 20.0% | 80.0% | View details | |
Haiti Moderate sample | 15 | 1 | 14 | 6.7% | 93.3% | View details | |
Democratic Republic Of Congo Moderate sample | 13 | 9 | 4 | 69.2% | 30.8% | View details | |
Honduras Moderate sample | 12 | 5 | 7 | 41.7% | 58.3% | View details | |
Dominican Republic Moderate sample | 11 | 0 | 11 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Spain Moderate sample | 10 | 1 | 9 | 10.0% | 90.0% | View details | |
Unknown Nationality Small sample | 9 | 3 | 6 | 33.3% | 66.7% | View details | |
Mexico Small sample | 7 | 1 | 6 | 14.3% | 85.7% | View details | |
Rwanda Small sample | 7 | 2 | 5 | 28.6% | 71.4% | View details | |
Switzerland Small sample | 7 | 2 | 5 | 28.6% | 71.4% | View details | |
Colombia Small sample | 6 | 1 | 5 | 16.7% | 83.3% | View details | |
Central African Republic Small sample | 5 | 2 | 3 | 40.0% | 60.0% | View details | |
Russia Small sample | 5 | 2 | 3 | 40.0% | 60.0% | View details | |
Venezuela Small sample | 5 | 1 | 4 | 20.0% | 80.0% | View details | |
India Small sample | 4 | 0 | 4 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Jamaica Small sample | 4 | 0 | 4 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Turkiye Small sample | 4 | 1 | 3 | 25.0% | 75.0% | View details |
Total decisions
146
Grants
31
Denials
115
Total decisions
49
Grants
3
Denials
46
Total decisions
26
Grants
4
Denials
22
Total decisions
20
Grants
4
Denials
16
Total decisions
15
Grants
1
Denials
14
Total decisions
13
Grants
9
Denials
4
Total decisions
12
Grants
5
Denials
7
Total decisions
11
Grants
0
Denials
11
Total decisions
10
Grants
1
Denials
9
Total decisions
9
Grants
3
Denials
6
Total decisions
7
Grants
1
Denials
6
Total decisions
7
Grants
2
Denials
5
Total decisions
7
Grants
2
Denials
5
Total decisions
6
Grants
1
Denials
5
Total decisions
5
Grants
2
Denials
3
Total decisions
5
Grants
2
Denials
3
Total decisions
5
Grants
1
Denials
4
Total decisions
4
Grants
0
Denials
4
Total decisions
4
Grants
0
Denials
4
Total decisions
4
Grants
1
Denials
3
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.