William David Neumeister
Court
Total Decisions
1576
Asylum Grant Rate
65.5%
Denials
34.5%
Other Relief Rate
0.0%
The sample size is relatively substantial, but it still cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Data updated: Aug 8, 2026
← All courtsactive active active active active
Immigration Court
Smo Immigration Court
Community discussion · 06 Judges indexed · CA
- State
- Immigration Court, CA
- Data Source
- EOIR Case Data
Average Asylum Grant Rate
64.9%
4152 / 6400
Average Asylum Grant Rate
64.9%
Asylum grants
4152
Denials
2248
Judges indexed
6
This page is based on public data currently organized by this site and may not represent complete real-time EOIR data.
Community perspective
Community discussion
Read public experiences and process discussions related to Smo Immigration Court.
0 topics
You can start with these public topics
- Share a public process or preparation experience
- Discuss how to interpret public data
- Ask a question without personal case details
Judges indexed for this court
Browse public data on U.S. immigration judges, including assigned court, asylum grant rate, denial rate, total decisions, and data sources.
active
Print Maggard
Court
Total Decisions
1286
Asylum Grant Rate
78.3%
Denials
21.7%
Other Relief Rate
0.0%
The sample size is relatively substantial, but it still cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Data updated: Aug 8, 2026
Vikram Badrinath
Court
Total Decisions
827
Asylum Grant Rate
70.4%
Denials
29.6%
Other Relief Rate
0.0%
The sample size is relatively substantial, but it still cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Data updated: Aug 8, 2026
Ravit R Halperin
Court
Total Decisions
669
Asylum Grant Rate
12.4%
Denials
87.6%
Other Relief Rate
0.0%
The sample size is relatively substantial, but it still cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Data updated: Aug 8, 2026
Denise Hunter
Court
Total Decisions
555
Asylum Grant Rate
78.0%
Denials
22.0%
Other Relief Rate
0.0%
The sample size is relatively substantial, but it still cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Data updated: Aug 8, 2026
Jonathan W Hitesman
Court
Total Decisions
234
Asylum Grant Rate
31.6%
Denials
68.4%
Other Relief Rate
0.0%
The sample size is relatively substantial, but it still cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Data updated: Aug 8, 2026
Asylum Grant Rate · Nationalities
| Nationalities | Asylum Grant Rate | Asylum grants | Denials | Total Decisions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Russia | 92.2% | 2001 | 170 | 2171 |
| India | 69.8% | 600 | 259 | 859 |
| Mexico | 20.4% | 139 | 541 | 680 |
| Guatemala | 27.3% | 138 | 368 | 506 |
| Spain | 28.8% | 135 | 333 | 468 |
| Afghanistan | 90.8% | 363 | 37 | 400 |
| Niue | 51.7% | 138 | 129 | 267 |
| Honduras | 40.2% | 74 | 110 | 184 |
| Ukraine | 93.7% | 118 | 8 | 126 |
| Belize | 100.0% | 72 | 0 | 72 |
| Colombia | 17.4% | 12 | 57 | 69 |
| Switzerland | 60.6% | 40 | 26 | 66 |
| Romania | 66.7% | 44 | 22 | 66 |
| Iraq | 53.3% | 24 | 21 | 45 |
| Venezuela | 46.3% | 19 | 22 | 41 |
| Peru | 15.0% | 6 | 34 | 40 |
| Kazakhstan | 100.0% | 37 | 0 | 37 |
| Armenia | 87.5% | 21 | 3 | 24 |
| Bulgaria | 50.0% | 10 | 10 | 20 |
| Vietnam | 89.5% | 17 | 2 | 19 |
| Azerbaijan | 88.2% | 15 | 2 | 17 |
| Philippines | 12.5% | 2 | 14 | 16 |
| Uzbekistan | 56.3% | 9 | 7 | 16 |
| Kyrgyzstan | 85.7% | 12 | 2 | 14 |
| Nepal | 75.0% | 9 | 3 | 12 |
| Iceland | 100.0% | 11 | 0 | 11 |
| Pakistan | 54.5% | 6 | 5 | 11 |
| Ecuador | 0.0% | 0 | 9 | 9 |
| Myanmar (Burma) | 50.0% | 4 | 4 | 8 |
| Iran | 87.5% | 7 | 1 | 8 |
| Turkiye | 25.0% | 2 | 6 | 8 |
| Indonesia | 42.9% | 3 | 4 | 7 |
| Syria | 100.0% | 7 | 0 | 7 |
| Unknown Nationality | 71.4% | 5 | 2 | 7 |
| Stateless — person unable to name a country | 100.0% | 6 | 0 | 6 |
| Moldova | 80.0% | 4 | 1 | 5 |
| Tristan da Cunha | 40.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 |
| Cameroon | 50.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 |
| Ethiopia | 75.0% | 3 | 1 | 4 |
| Former Countries | 100.0% | 4 | 0 | 4 |
| Haiti | 0.0% | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Nicaragua | 25.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 |
| Cuba | 66.7% | 2 | 1 | 3 |
| Eritrea | 100.0% | 3 | 0 | 3 |
| Mauritania | 0.0% | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Argentina | 100.0% | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Côte d’Ivoire | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Serbia | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Christmas Island | 100.0% | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Fiji | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Former Countries | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Georgia | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Guinea | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| St. Pierre & Miquelon | 100.0% | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Sri Lanka | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Türkiye | 100.0% | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Antigua & Barbuda | 100.0% | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Bahrain | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Brazil | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Bermuda | 100.0% | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| China | 100.0% | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Former Countries | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Georgia | 100.0% | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Ghana | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Guadeloupe | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| In Absentia/Unknown | 100.0% | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Jamaica | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Jordan | 100.0% | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Kenya | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Kuwait | 100.0% | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Lebanon | 100.0% | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Libya | 100.0% | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Madagascar | 100.0% | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Macao SAR China | 100.0% | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Rwanda | 100.0% | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Sierra Leone | 100.0% | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Russia | 100.0% | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| United Kingdom | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Data Source · Disclaimer
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.