Switzerland
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
97
Grants
76
Denials
21
Immigration judge
Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
Grant rate
43.9%
277 / 631
Total decisions
631
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
43.9%
Grants: 277
Denial rate
56.1%
Denials: 354
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
This profile is summarized from public sources for background context only. It is not an ImmJudge evaluation.
Attorney General William P. Barr appointed Tanawa Lebreton as an Immigration Judge in October 2020. Judge Lebreton earned a Bachelor of Arts in 2003 from Hunter College and a Juris Doctor in 2006 from Ave Maria School of Law. From 2017 to 2020, she was a practicegroup director with Inland Counties Legal Services, in Riverside, California. From 2010 to 2017,she was in private practice, in Temecula, California. From 2008 to 2009, she was a staff attorneywith Catholic Legal Services, in Miami. From 2006 to 2008, she was a legal trainee/extern with Capital Collateral Regional Counsel-South, in Fort Lauderdale, Florida. Judge Lebreton is amember of the Florida State Bar.
This summary is based on public material and may not reflect the latest assignment information.
Source: TRAC Judge Report · View original report
Community perspective
Read public experiences and process discussions related to Tanawa Lebreton.
You can start with these public topics
This table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Showing 0 of 0
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Switzerland Sufficient sample | 97 | 76 | 21 | 78.4% | 21.6% | View details | |
Guinea Sufficient sample | 57 | 12 | 45 | 21.1% | 78.9% | View details | |
Ecuador Sufficient sample | 50 | 6 | 44 | 12.0% | 88.0% | View details | |
Singapore Sufficient sample | 50 | 6 | 44 | 12.0% | 88.0% | View details | |
India Sufficient sample | 45 | 13 | 32 | 28.9% | 71.1% | View details | |
Bulgaria Sufficient sample | 35 | 20 | 15 | 57.1% | 42.9% | View details | |
Honduras Moderate sample | 25 | 8 | 17 | 32.0% | 68.0% | View details | |
Ghana Moderate sample | 21 | 7 | 14 | 33.3% | 66.7% | View details | |
Albania Moderate sample | 20 | 9 | 11 | 45.0% | 55.0% | View details | |
Mauritania Moderate sample | 19 | 5 | 14 | 26.3% | 73.7% | View details | |
Niue Moderate sample | 16 | 12 | 4 | 75.0% | 25.0% | View details | |
Venezuela Moderate sample | 15 | 13 | 2 | 86.7% | 13.3% | View details | |
Russia Moderate sample | 14 | 11 | 3 | 78.6% | 21.4% | View details | |
Guatemala Moderate sample | 13 | 5 | 8 | 38.5% | 61.5% | View details | |
Bolivia Moderate sample | 12 | 7 | 5 | 58.3% | 41.7% | View details | |
Kosovo Moderate sample | 10 | 6 | 4 | 60.0% | 40.0% | View details | |
Spain Small sample | 9 | 4 | 5 | 44.4% | 55.6% | View details | |
Former Countries Small sample | 8 | 6 | 2 | 75.0% | 25.0% | View details | |
Georgia Small sample | 8 | 4 | 4 | 50.0% | 50.0% | View details | |
Peru Small sample | 8 | 1 | 7 | 12.5% | 87.5% | View details |
Total decisions
97
Grants
76
Denials
21
Total decisions
57
Grants
12
Denials
45
Total decisions
50
Grants
6
Denials
44
Total decisions
50
Grants
6
Denials
44
Total decisions
45
Grants
13
Denials
32
Total decisions
35
Grants
20
Denials
15
Total decisions
25
Grants
8
Denials
17
Total decisions
21
Grants
7
Denials
14
Total decisions
20
Grants
9
Denials
11
Total decisions
19
Grants
5
Denials
14
Total decisions
16
Grants
12
Denials
4
Total decisions
15
Grants
13
Denials
2
Total decisions
14
Grants
11
Denials
3
Total decisions
13
Grants
5
Denials
8
Total decisions
12
Grants
7
Denials
5
Total decisions
10
Grants
6
Denials
4
Total decisions
9
Grants
4
Denials
5
Total decisions
8
Grants
6
Denials
2
Total decisions
8
Grants
4
Denials
4
Total decisions
8
Grants
1
Denials
7
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.