Singapore
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
129
Grants
2
Denials
127
Immigration judge
Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
Grant rate
12.7%
137 / 1075
Total decisions
1075
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
12.7%
Grants: 137
Denial rate
87.3%
Denials: 938
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
This profile is summarized from public sources for background context only. It is not an ImmJudge evaluation.
Attorney General William P. Barr appointed James R. Mc Kee as an Immigration Judge in October 2020. Judge Mc Kee earned a Bachelor of Arts in 1988 from Syracuse University, a Juris Doctor in 1991 from the Syracuse University College of Law, and a Master of Laws in 2002from the Judge Advocate General’s Legal Center and School. From 2018 to 2020, he served aschief, Foreign Law Branch, Department of Defense, in Wiesbaden, Germany, and the Intelligence and Security Command, in Fort Meade, Maryland. From 2016 to 2018, he servedwith the September 11th Victim Compensation Fund, Department of Justice. From 1994 to 2016,he served as a U.S. Army judge advocate in multiple positions in the criminal, operational, andadministrative law divisions. He also served in the legal assistance, training development andfuture concepts directorates, and as the first program manager of the Special Victims’ Counsel Program, in the U.S., Germany, Iraq, and Afghanistan. From 1996 to 2001, he served with NATO in Bosnia-Herzegovina, Croatia, and Kosovo. From 2003 to 2013, he served in Operation Enduring Freedom once and in Operation Iraqi Freedom three times, retiring as colonel in 2016.From 1989 to 1993, he served as an enlisted infantry soldier with the 10th Mountain Division,Communications and Legislative Affairs Division New York Army National Guard. From 1991 to 1993, he served as a clerk for the 60th Judicial District Court of Common Pleas, in Pike County, Pennsylvania. Judge Mc Kee is a member of the New York State Bar and the Pennsylvania State Bar.
This summary is based on public material and may not reflect the latest assignment information.
Source: TRAC Judge Report · View original report
Community perspective
Read public experiences and process discussions related to James McKee.
You can start with these public topics
This table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Showing 0 of 0
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Singapore Sufficient sample | 129 | 2 | 127 | 1.6% | 98.4% | View details | |
Ecuador Sufficient sample | 111 | 7 | 104 | 6.3% | 93.7% | View details | |
Guinea Sufficient sample | 111 | 4 | 107 | 3.6% | 96.4% | View details | |
Honduras Sufficient sample | 87 | 17 | 70 | 19.5% | 80.5% | View details | |
Switzerland Sufficient sample | 64 | 19 | 45 | 29.7% | 70.3% | View details | |
Guatemala Sufficient sample | 63 | 0 | 63 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Mauritania Sufficient sample | 41 | 1 | 40 | 2.4% | 97.6% | View details | |
Bulgaria Sufficient sample | 37 | 0 | 37 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Venezuela Sufficient sample | 34 | 11 | 23 | 32.4% | 67.6% | View details | |
Peru Sufficient sample | 31 | 1 | 30 | 3.2% | 96.8% | View details | |
Spain Sufficient sample | 30 | 0 | 30 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Niue Moderate sample | 29 | 6 | 23 | 20.7% | 79.3% | View details | |
India Moderate sample | 27 | 2 | 25 | 7.4% | 92.6% | View details | |
Ghana Moderate sample | 25 | 1 | 24 | 4.0% | 96.0% | View details | |
Colombia Moderate sample | 23 | 4 | 19 | 17.4% | 82.6% | View details | |
Albania Moderate sample | 22 | 14 | 8 | 63.6% | 36.4% | View details | |
Dominican Republic Moderate sample | 22 | 0 | 22 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Russia Moderate sample | 19 | 12 | 7 | 63.2% | 36.8% | View details | |
Bolivia Moderate sample | 15 | 3 | 12 | 20.0% | 80.0% | View details | |
Mexico Moderate sample | 14 | 1 | 13 | 7.1% | 92.9% | View details |
Total decisions
129
Grants
2
Denials
127
Total decisions
111
Grants
7
Denials
104
Total decisions
111
Grants
4
Denials
107
Total decisions
87
Grants
17
Denials
70
Total decisions
64
Grants
19
Denials
45
Total decisions
63
Grants
0
Denials
63
Total decisions
41
Grants
1
Denials
40
Total decisions
37
Grants
0
Denials
37
Total decisions
34
Grants
11
Denials
23
Total decisions
31
Grants
1
Denials
30
Total decisions
30
Grants
0
Denials
30
Total decisions
29
Grants
6
Denials
23
Total decisions
27
Grants
2
Denials
25
Total decisions
25
Grants
1
Denials
24
Total decisions
23
Grants
4
Denials
19
Total decisions
22
Grants
14
Denials
8
Total decisions
22
Grants
0
Denials
22
Total decisions
19
Grants
12
Denials
7
Total decisions
15
Grants
3
Denials
12
Total decisions
14
Grants
1
Denials
13
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.