Spain
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
535
Grants
27
Denials
508
Immigration judge
Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
Grant rate
20.8%
567 / 2731
Total decisions
2731
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
20.8%
Grants: 567
Denial rate
79.2%
Denials: 2164
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
This profile is summarized from public sources for background context only. It is not an ImmJudge evaluation.
Judge Travieso was appointed as an Immigration Judge in May 2006. He received a Bachelor of Arts degree in 1982 from California State University, Fullerton, and a Juris Doctorate in 1995 from Loyola Law School. Judge Travieso served as an assistant U.S. attorney in Los Angeles from August 2001 to May 2006. From August 1995 to August 2001, he served as an assistant district counsel for INS in Los Angeles. During this time period, Judge Travieso was detailed as a trial attorney to the Office of Immigration Litigation in Los Angeles, from August 2000 to August 2001. He is a member of the California Bar.
This summary is based on public material and may not reflect the latest assignment information.
Source: TRAC Judge Report · View original report
Community perspective
Read public experiences and process discussions related to Frank M Travieso.
You can start with these public topics
This table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Showing 0 of 0
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Spain Sufficient sample | 535 | 27 | 508 | 5.0% | 95.0% | View details | |
Guatemala Sufficient sample | 516 | 7 | 509 | 1.4% | 98.6% | View details | |
Switzerland Sufficient sample | 269 | 127 | 142 | 47.2% | 52.8% | View details | |
Mexico Sufficient sample | 228 | 10 | 218 | 4.4% | 95.6% | View details | |
Honduras Sufficient sample | 221 | 4 | 217 | 1.8% | 98.2% | View details | |
Colombia Sufficient sample | 204 | 19 | 185 | 9.3% | 90.7% | View details | |
Armenia Sufficient sample | 151 | 87 | 64 | 57.6% | 42.4% | View details | |
Russia Sufficient sample | 121 | 73 | 48 | 60.3% | 39.7% | View details | |
Niue Sufficient sample | 81 | 37 | 44 | 45.7% | 54.3% | View details | |
Peru Sufficient sample | 75 | 5 | 70 | 6.7% | 93.3% | View details | |
Indonesia Sufficient sample | 48 | 5 | 43 | 10.4% | 89.6% | View details | |
India Sufficient sample | 32 | 21 | 11 | 65.6% | 34.4% | View details | |
Egypt Sufficient sample | 30 | 28 | 2 | 93.3% | 6.7% | View details | |
Iran Moderate sample | 22 | 17 | 5 | 77.3% | 22.7% | View details | |
Ecuador Moderate sample | 20 | 1 | 19 | 5.0% | 95.0% | View details | |
Cameroon Moderate sample | 15 | 14 | 1 | 93.3% | 6.7% | View details | |
Cuba Moderate sample | 10 | 6 | 4 | 60.0% | 40.0% | View details | |
Eritrea Moderate sample | 10 | 6 | 4 | 60.0% | 40.0% | View details | |
Romania Small sample | 9 | 2 | 7 | 22.2% | 77.8% | View details | |
Venezuela Small sample | 9 | 2 | 7 | 22.2% | 77.8% | View details |
Total decisions
535
Grants
27
Denials
508
Total decisions
516
Grants
7
Denials
509
Total decisions
269
Grants
127
Denials
142
Total decisions
228
Grants
10
Denials
218
Total decisions
221
Grants
4
Denials
217
Total decisions
204
Grants
19
Denials
185
Total decisions
151
Grants
87
Denials
64
Total decisions
121
Grants
73
Denials
48
Total decisions
81
Grants
37
Denials
44
Total decisions
75
Grants
5
Denials
70
Total decisions
48
Grants
5
Denials
43
Total decisions
32
Grants
21
Denials
11
Total decisions
30
Grants
28
Denials
2
Total decisions
22
Grants
17
Denials
5
Total decisions
20
Grants
1
Denials
19
Total decisions
15
Grants
14
Denials
1
Total decisions
10
Grants
6
Denials
4
Total decisions
10
Grants
6
Denials
4
Total decisions
9
Grants
2
Denials
7
Total decisions
9
Grants
2
Denials
7
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.